articlePage.html

|
 |
|
Last Updated: Oct 16, 2008 - 6:16:00 AM |
Hubei Province Writer Deng Fuhua Strongly Protests Violation of his Human Rights
Several days ago, Hubei writer Deng Fuhua had his rights egregiously
violated by Hubei Province Shiyan City authorities. He is using
multiple channels to express his strong disagreement with this
treatment. This includes drafting a letter to the people in charge of
the Municipal Standing Committee of the National Peoples Congress,
hoping that local and national legal and supervisory authorities will
take it upon themselves to accord with the law and protect the personal
and democratic rights of an individual citizen.
With Deng Fuhua's permission, we enclose the content of his letter to
the Shiyan Municipal Standing Committee of the National Peoples
Congress Communist Party Leading Group Secretary and Standing Committee
Deputy Director Guan Xiaolan. We hope that domestic and international
media will distribute the message widely:
Deng Fuhua's telephone number: 139-719-00079
Dear Director Guan:
I will first summarize my situation in writing. I hope that you will make a formal inquiry into these matters.
http://news.boxun.com/news/gb/china/2008/10/200810161534.shtml
Professor Li Daokui who has returned from overseas to direct Qinghua
University's Research Center for China and the World Economy, is a
representative of the former view. On CCTV's Economic Channel, he
proposed an offensive and defensive strategy for the crisis facing
China, to change crisis into opportunity and ensure continued economic
growth for 30 years. Li in fact offered no wisdom about how China would
hold its own in this crisis; aware that expanding exports and
investment is no longer viable, he blandly proposed the Government to
go into deficit to stimulate consumption. On the subject of taking
advantage of the plight others are undergoing, however, Li had a
different idea to those who advocate buying up cheap overseas assets:
foster, as a strategic investment, a segment of Chinese government
officials to gradually gain entry to the boards of directors of Western
financial institutions, gaining rights to information and even
controlling shares, and leaving scouts and even Trojan horses in the
Western financial system.
However, most people in today's China have lost interest in these fairy
tales told by "returnees," because it is clear to all endowed with a
little common sense that the advent of the global financial crisis
sharply increases the possibility of China moving into troubled times.
In the short term, China is indeed in an relatively advantageous
position in the global financial tsunami because China is a creditor,
rather than a debtor trapped in a payment crisis. China's frustration,
however is that, as a creditor, it unable to take the opportunity to
obtain its debtors' good assets at low cost, because the Chinese
bureaucracy is incapable of identifying or managing them. Above all,
the Chinese government totally lacks either the confidence or ability
to prevent its own bureaucrats from turning against it and pursuing
personal benefit at significant cost to national interests. As a
result, China had no choice but to allow the United States and other
Western countries to issue a large amount of currency to dilute
Chinese's claims on them, significantly depreciating China's overseas
financial assets.
Of course, Wen Jiabao does not mind the huge devaluation of China's
foreign exchange reserves at this time because he has bigger problems
to face. In order to curb inflation, Wen carried out monetary
tightening for 10 months, badly hurting the domestic economy. He must
now make a U-turn in order to stop the economy from going into a
disastrous recession. Everyone knows that the key to addressing China's
economic problems is to raise domestic demand, especially to increase
consumer demand from the peasantry. However, the problem of
insufficient consumer demand among Chinese people is not new. Why then
is it so difficult to solve? Given the global financial crisis, what is
the ultimate meaning for the CPC regime of this long-standing major
problem?
A deep reason why China embarked on an abnormal development model that
is highly dependent on export demand, was that the CPC leaders always
adhere to the policy of "preferring to endow friendly nations, rather
than give to household slaves." They would rather present developed
countries with large amounts of purchasing power for nothing, than
raise the basic rights of Chinese people, because they intuitively
understand that enhancing these rights would eventually threaten their
privileges and the Party's birthright. The problem is that without
enhancing ordinary people's basic rights, it is impossible to raise the
national share of consumption demand. The outbreak of the global
financial crisis blocks the path of supporting growth by expanding
China's exports, forcing the CPC regime to face the problem of basic
rights of China's people, especially the peasants.
That being the case, is the regime capable of enhancing peasants' basic
rights? They couldn't achieve this even under favorable external
economic circumstances in the past; what reason is there to believe
that they are able to do so with the world in extreme economic
circumstances? The communiqué of the just-concluded Third Plenary
Session of the 17th Central Committee is full of empty castles in the
air. Empty talk is tolerable in good times, but carrying on with
nothing but empty talk in the face of adversity can't be called
anything but ominous. It makes us aware that, in a time of crisis, the
CPC is stuck with its mediocre and incompetent leadership. If this
problem drags on and the global financial crisis continues to worsen,
the outbreak of comprehensive crisis in China becomes entirely possible.
梁京: 席卷全球的金融危机对中国意味着什么?
© Copyright 2008 by Boxun News
Top of Page
|
|
 |

|